Task 3: Development & Design

 Recap of Task 3 Brief: 

The next phase involves creating a design based on the proposed idea from Task 2. This design must demonstrate an understanding of design principles throughout the development process and final outcome. Any medium or material may be used, except full photography, to effectively communicate the visual message. Additionally, all work completed for the module, including the final design, must be documented in a blog, concluding with a final reflection.

Selected Idea from Task 2: Nature vs Structure

1. Visual References / Inspiration

Fig 1.1 (Free flowing lines/ Movement)

Fig 1.2 (Tree rings)

Fig 1.3 (Tree roots cracking through concrete)

Fig 1.4 (Nature vs Structure)

Fig 1.5 (Biomorphic design)

Fig 1.6 (Art Nouveau)

Fig 1.7 (Organic Architecture)

2. Progress of Designing 

Fig 2.1 Outline

Fig 2.2 Changed background colour

Fig 2.3 Started the colouring process

Fig 2.4 Colouring process

Fig 2.5 Blending

3. Final Design

Fig 3.1 Grid to Growth

Rationale

Fig 3.1 is a reinterpretation of Victory Boogie Woogie, replacing Mondrian’s strict grid with flowing, organic shapes. This change represents how nature and human-made structures interact and influence each other. Instead of being in conflict, these two elements are connected, constantly shaping and reshaping one another.

The design explores how cities try to impose order on nature, but nature always finds ways to adapt and reclaim space. Tree roots crack through pavement, rivers carve their own paths, and vines overtake abandoned buildings. In this composition, geometric shapes gradually transform into softer, natural forms; just as urban landscapes are softened by nature over time. The smooth blending of these elements shows that nature and structure are not separate forces but parts of a continuous cycle.

Key design principles bring this idea to life. Movement is created through flowing lines that guide the viewer’s eye, reinforcing nature’s ability to adapt. Contrast is achieved by placing sharp, geometric forms next to soft, organic curves, emphasising their differences while showing their connection. Balance ensures neither element dominates, reflecting their coexistence.

Ultimately, this design challenges the idea that cities and nature are separate. Instead, it suggests they are always evolving together, shaping the world in a constant, dynamic relationship.